5 Things You Never Knew About E-mail Closings

5 Things You Never Knew About E-mail Closings You have worked tirelessly to craft the perfect ePenguin Books Representative901-456-9021johnpexample@gmail.comThis example includes a final statement in its body that should inspire the receiver to act and answer the message. It includes a sign-off statement that is appropriate for the context of the message (formal business). In addition, it contains crucial contact information, including the senders name, the company the person works for (if applicable), the phone number, and a return e-mail address. Including this information will make it very easy for the receiver to get back in touch with you.Ending the perfect e-mail may sound easy, but it takes a bit more planning and preparation than many people realize. It could make all of the difference as far as leaving the receiver of your message with the proper impression of you. Ending the body of your message with a call to action will help inspire a quicker response to your message.Choosing the perfect sign-off or closing statement s will depend on the context of the message. Be sure to choose the proper statements for formal business situations, casual business situations, or casual situations including messages directed towards a loved one, family, and friends. Even small details such as the closing statement can be the difference between landing the perfect job and having your e-mail ignored or passed over.Once you have chosen the perfect closing statement, make sure that it is properly formatted. Be sure to include contact information such as your name, company name, phone number and e-mail address to make it easy for the recipient to contact you. If you follow these guidelines, you are certainly more likely to get the response that you desire. Little things such as a properly crafted e-mail closing can make a big difference if you want to make the right impression.

Inequality in the Workplace essays

Inequality in the Workplace essays Is it fair that men make more money than women do, even though they both have the same qualifications? Is it fair that women are less likely than men to get promoted are? Is it fair that women start at lower positions in the work place than men do? Discrimination in the work place is hindering gender relations in todays modern society. Women are getting fed up with always being treated unfairly by the employers. They feel that employers should base their decision on who can do the better job, not who is the male and who is the female. Hiring, promotion, and salaries are the three main factors that separate the men from the women in the work place. In hiring, men are much more likely to get a job than women are. Although in the last 10 to 15 years, women have gradually closed the gaps. In 1974, 14 to 25% of women earned bachelor degrees in computer and mathematical science. While in 1989, the women that earned the same degrees were 33 to 37% of the graduates. (Frenkel, 1990) Now, because the percentage of bachelor degrees has increased during that period, you would think that the hiring increase would be the same. Well, the hiring of women has only increased about 5%. So, are employers really looking for who gets hired with what degree or is it irrelevant? I feel that for the most part, employers do look at the accomplishments of a future employee, regardless of gender. In the past, that might have been different, but today, an employer would hire a more highly skilled women worker, than an average male worker. I think employers have a sort of obligation to hire the women. The companies sometimes feel that if they dont hire enough women, a discrimination suit could arise and that would hurt not only the company financially, but their reputation as well. In almost every industry, women occupy a very small proportion of the higher-level positions. For example, a 1988 study found that only three CEOs among...

Term Project - Chapter 14 Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Term Project - Chapter 14 Summary - Essay Example Pioneers led a very harsh life. By 1840, the American population had extended across the Alleghenies (Kennedy and Cohen 288). The western landscape was shaped by the individuals who conquered it. The shapers included the farmers of tobacco who would use land to exhaustion then find new fertile places for their tobacco farming. In Kentucky, tall canes were burnt down to provide access to farm lands for tobacco after which â€Å"settlers soon discovered that when the cane was burned off, European bluegrass thrived in the charred cane fields† (Kennedy and Cohen 288). Trapping emerged as a lucrative business for fur trappers, which negatively impacted on the beaver population. Even though the invaders of the western lands cherished using the lands for production, it is also clear that aericans beheld the beauty of the land occupied by the natives. This is evident in the move of George Catlin, an artist, who painted a picture of the western landscape inhabited by the Native Americans (Agnew 9). Catlin’s proposal for national parks would see the creation of Yellowstone, the pioneer national park, i n 1872 (Kennedy and Cohen 290). Also, buffalo were also hunted for their valuable hides, which threatened their existence as their population fell through the eighteenth century. This event depicts rapid growth in population by mid-1800s. During 1840s and 50s, the Europeans were immigrating to Americas because Europe’s population was rapidly increasing creating pressure on land. The Europeans immigrants were in search of land to settle and also to evade the autocratic leadership that had impoverished them in the past. They were seeking a new start in their lives. Thirty three states had been formed by 1860, with the United States ranked third based on population. This population explosion led to increased outbreak of diseases and waning standards of living in the west. Many Irish, who were mostly Roman-Catholic, moved to America in 1840s following a significant